Sunday, October 15, 2023
Complete kirtana
Monday, October 9, 2023
Sravana Guru
Three Kinds of Gurus
In Bhakti-sandarbha Srila Jiva Goswami, in examining guru-tattva, has cited three types of guru:
Sravana-guru
The person from whom one hears knowledge of the bhaktas, bhakti and bhagavat-tattva is known as the Sravana-guru. In the conversation between Maharaja Nimi and the Nava-Yogendras in Srimad Bhagavatam (11.3.22) it is said:
tatra bhāgavatān dharmān
śikṣed gurv-ātma-daivataḥ
amāyayānuvṛttyā yais
tuṣyed ātmātma-do hariḥ
Accepting the bona fide spiritual master as one’s life and soul and worshipable deity, the disciple should learn from him the process of pure devotional service. The Supreme Personality of Godhead, Hari,the soul of all souls, is inclined to give Himself to His pure devotees.Therefore, the disciple should learn from the spiritual master to serve the Lord without duplicity and in such a faithful and favorable way that the Supreme Lord, being satisfied, will offer Himself to the faithful disciple.
Such a person who gives instructions on how to execute bhajana is called a Sravana-guru. There may be many Sravana-gurus; nonetheless the sadhaka should take shelter of one Mahapurusha among them who is suitable to his nature and receive instructions from him regarding how to perform bhajana.
Siksha-guru
Out of many such competent Sravana-gurus, one who gives instructions in bhajana which are just suitable to the bhava of the sadhaka is called a Siksha-guru. There may be many Siksha-gurus also; however, it is advantageous to have one Siksha-guru in particular who is conducive to one’s mood. The Sravana-guru and the Siksha-guru are usually one and the same person.
Diksha-guru
One who gives a mantra for worship according to the rules and regulations of scripture is called a Diksha-guru. The Diksha-guru should possess all the symptoms already described of a Mahapurusha and those described in connection with the sad-guru. The Diksha-guru should be conversant in the conclusions of the Vedas, he should be adept in expounding those conclusions, he should have direct experience and realisation of the Supreme Lord, and he should be completely detached from material sense objects. If he is lacking in these characteristics, then the faith of the disciple will waiver.
There is only one Diksha-guru. The Siksha-guru should be in conformity with the Diksha-guru; otherwise impediments may arise in the practice of sadhana. Ordinarily the Diksha-guru carries out the function of Siksha-guru. In his absence one should accept as one’s Siksha-guru an advanced devotee possessing the characteristics already described.
Gurus are of three categories:
śravaṇa-guru (the person from whom one hears knowledge of the bhaktas, bhakti and bhagavat-tattva),
dīkṣā-guru (one who gives a mantra for worship according to the rules and regulations of scripture),
śikṣā-guru (one who gives instructions in bhajana).
How can we use the word ‘my’ ?
Hare Kṛṣṇa!
Okay, we have last question here from
Candramālā and, well, she quotes purport from Third Canto (Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam
3.20.18 ), but basically her question is that Prabhupāda says that, if we
have this conception that something belongs to us is only due to our bodily
conception of life and by thinking like that, then that increases our
ignorance. So her point is that, well, but does not calling something mine
increase also our sense of responsibility, like my spiritual master, my
service, my spouse and so on. So does that also increase our ignorance?
Okay,
my answer.
So,
here the underlying conception which is important, Śrīla Prabhupāda said, my,
he referred to, I do not know, my disciples and my BBT and so on. So, Śrīla
Prabhupāda's use of the word “my” and our use of the word my is really
conventional, it is practical. It is something that people relate to, they
connect with and it is also a practical way for us to actually communicate. But
what is the underlying consciousness? When I really think
īśvaro 'ham ahaṁ bhogī
(Bhagavad-gītā 16.13-15)
that, I am the controller, something belongs
to me, that means I am also the enjoyer, then yes, that will increase our
ignorance, it will increase our bodily conception of life, it will cause us
further suffering, further obstacle in spiritual life.
If
however we are thinking that everything belongs to Krishna and everyone is Kṛṣṇa's
servant, then that the way that we use the language is not, I am referring now
to the conventional way that we use the word my, is not detrimental.
So what
do we think? How do we, when I say this is my husband, what does that mean? It
means that, from the spiritual point of view that I know that everyone is nitya
kṛṣṇa dasa (kṛṣṇera ’nitya-dāsa’ – Caitanya-caritāmṛta Madhya 20.108-109), everyone is Kṛṣṇa's
servant, here is some living entity, who is on his way to Kṛṣṇa just like I am
on my journey to Kṛṣṇa and now what is my duty, what is my responsibility in
this world for the temporary time that I am here. So that is fine.
But
when we forget that and probably with the family connection it is the
strongest. When I am thinking - these are my children, this is my daughter,
this is my son, for women attachment to husband is not that strong, but still
those attachments become:
puṁsaḥ striyā mithunī-bhāvam etaṁ
(Bhāg 5.5.8)
they
are very blinding, they are extremely strong.
So how
do we keep that consciousness that everything is Kṛṣṇa's? Well, it is a
sadhana, it is a practice in Gītā 9th chapter, 10th chapter Kṛṣṇa explained to
us how we see things, objects as manifestations of his potency,
raso 'ham apsu kaunteya (Bhg 7.8)
he is the
taste in water and what is the water,
bhūmir āpo 'nalo vāyuḥ khaṁ mano buddhir eva ca (Bhg 7.4)
that it
is just his external energy, water as Kṛṣṇa's external energy. So, when we see
that everything belongs to Kṛṣṇa, everything is a manifestation of Kṛṣṇa's energy
and we practice that, it is something that we need to practice, it is a little
more difficult than the sādhana that we perform with the senses, because
now it is something that we have to also perform with the mind.
So when
we practice like that then gradually, gradually our conventional use of the
word “my” becomes beneficial, it becomes part of our advancement in Kṛṣṇa
consciousness, why? Because we are always thinking - Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa, Kṛṣṇa, it
actually belongs to Kṛṣṇa.
So,
when that underlying good consciousness is there then yes - we progress and
when it is not, or when it is more not than it is, because everything does not
happen from one to the other overnight, then that becomes a possible obstacle
on our progress in devotional service.
So, sādhu
savadhana1 devotees should be very much careful in this regard
and so Bhāgavatam says,
janasya moho 'yam ahaṁ mameti (Bhāg 5.5.8)
these
are the two main traps of material existence, I and my.
Hare Kṛṣṇa.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. (Sāvadhāna (सावधान)
1) Attentive, bestowing attention, careful, heedful.
2) Cautious.
3) Diligent

